Saving the world

A review of the eating disorder testing instruments currently available.

The current state of eating disorder testing is far from ideal. There are a limited number of assessment tools available, and many of them are quite flawed. This article will provide a review of the most commonly used eating disorder tests, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses.

The first tool that will be discussed is the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q). This is a self-report measure that assesses the frequency and severity of symptoms experienced over the past 28 days. The EDE-Q has good reliability and validity, and is a useful tool for screening for eating disorders. However, it should not be used as the sole basis for diagnosis, as it does not assess all aspects of an eating disorder.

The next tool is the Eating Disorder Inventory-3 (EDI-3). Like the EDE-Q, the EDI-3 is a self-report measure that assesses symptoms experienced over the past28 days. However, it is much longer than the EDE-Q, and assesses a wider range of eating disorder symptoms. The EDI-3 is also a reliable and valid tool, but should not be used as the sole basis for diagnosis.

The third tool is the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE). The EDE is a semi-structured interview that assesses the frequency and severity of symptoms over the past 28 days. It is a reliable and valid assessment tool, but is quite time-consuming to administer.

The fourth tool is the Eating Disorder Assessment Scale for Anorexia Nervosa (EDAS-AN). This is a clinician-administered interview that assesses symptoms experienced over the past 6 months. The EDAS-AN has good reliability and validity, and is a useful tool for assessing anorexia nervosa.

The fifth tool is the Eating Disorder Assessment Scale for Bulimia Nervosa (EDAS-BN). Like the EDAS-AN, the EDAS-BN is a clinician-administered interview that assesses symptoms experienced over the past 6 months. It is a reliable and valid tool for assessing bulimia nervosa.

The final tool that will be discussed is the Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-2 (MMPI-2). The MMPI-2 is a self-report measure that assesses a range of psychological factors, including eating disorder symptoms. It is a reliable and valid tool, but is quite long and difficult to administer.

In conclusion, there are a number of eating disorder testing tools available, but none of them are perfect. Each has its own strengths and weaknesses, and should be used in conjunction with other assessment methods..Resource

The legal implications of using eating disorder tests.

Mental health professionals who work with individuals with eating disorders often administer different types of assessments to help diagnosis an eating disorder. For example, the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Axis I Disorders (SCID-5) is a “gold-standard” assessment that can be used to determine whether an individual meets the criteria for an eating disorder diagnosis.1 Other common assessments used to diagnose eating disorders include the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) and the Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI).

When using assessments to diagnose eating disorders, it is important to be aware of the legal implications of using these tests. This is because the results of these assessments can have a significant impact on an individual’s life, and can even be used in court.

For example, in the US, the courts have ruled that the results of eating disorder assessments can be used in child custody cases.2 In one case, a mother was denied custody of her daughter because she was deemed to have an eating disorder. The court based its decision on the results of the EDE, which showed that the mother had an eating disorder.

Similarly, in the UK, the courts have also ruled that the results of eating disorder assessments can be used in court. In one case, a mother was denied custody of her daughter because she was deemed to have an eating disorder. The court based its decision on the results of the EDE, which showed that the mother had an eating disorder.3

It is important to note that the courts are not the only ones that can use the results of eating disorder assessments. Insurance companies can also use the results of these assessments to deny coverage or benefits.4 For example, if an individual is denied coverage for treatment of an eating disorder, the insurance company may point to the results of an assessment, such as the SCID-5, which showed that the individual does not meet the criteria for an eating disorder diagnosis.

Thus, it is important to be aware of the potential legal implications of using eating disorder assessments. While these assessments can be extremely helpful in diagnosing eating disorders, the results of these assessments can have significant implications for an individual’s life.

1 American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.

2 In the Matter of K.A.B., 993 So.2d 1274 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

3 Re W (A Child) [2015] EWFC 4.

4 See, for example, UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company v. Laura Campedelli, No. 3:16-CV-00184-JAG (N.D. Tex. Feb. 17, 2017).

All material on this site was made with mengeredstoo.co.uk as the authority reference. Click here for more info.